D700 raw files

What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality.

Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.

Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. Started Nov 2, Discussions thread. Nov 2, I have uploaded a set of original Nikon RAW. NEF files for all to download to my website. You can download all the original NEF files for your personal use Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain.

Isn't it? For those looking for a specific ISO. Re: For those looking for a specific ISO. It's terrific. I have updated the page with more images from the cameras. Forum Parent First Previous Next. Color scheme? You may also like.

Why do photographers bother with RAW files when they can get the jpegs straight out of the camera? That is, it has finer gradations or transitions of tone and color.

This gives photographers more leeway to make changes to the image. The JPEG algorithm cannot discriminate such fine gradations of color, so in the process of compressing and saving the files, it discards some pixels that are subtly different from the ones it keeps. Altering JPEGs can lead to posterization , which is what happens when the color loses its smooth tonal transitions and breaks up into bands of color. It does this because the intermediate colors are lost in the process of altering the image.

Why would photographers want to alter images? Well there are many reasons, but one common one is so they can adjust the exposure after the event.

Adjusting exposure to brighten up the RAW file in Photoshop or some other imaging editor is likely to produce a better final image than trying to do the same thing to a JPEG.

On the other hand, if the photographer can get the exposure right in the camera, he or she can let the camera convert the RAW file with its own internal RAW processor, and have a JPEG ready to use. Even if I ever destroy my shutter, I would probably send it for repair because of how much I love this damn camera.

Also some professionals still use cameras like Nikon F3 John Free and they produce amazing images as well. If You wondering if You should get D? Good luck folks! And for the people who still use D — Keep on making those stunning images! I am looking to upgrade from a Nikon D to a Nikon d in , with the year half way through. I was wondering if it would still be a good upgrade? Even after all this time passed. If i did upgrade what are somethings i should look into getting a Flash?

I also have a LED wand and I plan on using a 50mm 1. The 50mm 1. I have a d2x and want to have an additional camera for landscapes.

Every one says go d but for the price I can get the d and a 24mm prime. Is the d the right choice? Use the best glass available if you can i. The correct CF cards for that era can still be had on e-bay for near nothing, and new batteries which are not available anymore by Nikon can be had in the same place from overseas. Get a good deal on an SB , or even for that matter and you will have great a great camera system for life. Quite honestly, against much heated debate over the years about leaving settings at defaults and tweaking later, I have found on my D that bumping up in-camera Neutral contrast one notch, and saturation 2 notches, shooting in sRGB color space… I no longer play with skin tone adjustments anymore I use the best uncompressed RAW quality as well… mainly in case I really need to fix something.

After adjustments, those are converted to whatever format and quality required. I also like Lightroom for Black and White conversion. That sensor received high praises back in the day from even film enthusiasts — which said a lot right there. The D is still an absolute work horse even in Use fast glass, learn to work with bounce flash and High Speed Sync, use tripods or at least a pogo stick when necessary… low light and dynamic range issues become… well, minimal issues at best.

As noted in the article, LR is your friend when needed, and it does a superb job with minimal touchup. The D is a winner on all counts. The D delivers just a tad and I mean a tad! For what it cost for a D, one could smartly seek out a D, a D, a 50mm 1.

You would have a semi pro full sensor and a semi pro crop sensor, each set up and ready to go. Thanks so much for your insights. I may be contacting you for a guest post…! I have used a Nikon D as first entry-level camera for the past four years. I have taken photography lessons and feel I am nearing an upgrade to more of a robust camera. I had my eye on a D until my photography course tutor recommended an upgrade to a D Love to, but with a wife, three kids and dog to support, I would not be able to justify a large upgrade.

So, my choices would be between a D DX and D What would you recommend? I have 50mm AF-D and a mm 2. I shoot raw and edit. Glad you Mark! I have never had dslr camera , then compare d and d, i decided to buy d , is it true choice? And which is cheap lens for it? I just upgraded from a D, the D feels exactly like the D, they are both fine cameras.

The reason for the upgrade was for the larger sensor and better ISO. The D give more of a wide angle view which I prefer. Currently have a Canon d but can get hold of a Nikon D for a similar price to what I can get for my current set up. Do you think this would be worth my while? Do you think I should go for it?

Thanks very much!! The high ISO capabilities of the D compared to your current camera will mean you can get cleaner astro files. I am primarily a portrait photographer and would love to use my 50mm f1. I would like to ask how the D renders skin tones. I hardly have to do a thing and the images, if I nail focus, have so much detail. Also, how would the detail on the D compare? I love Fuji but for events the focusing is just not up to scratch on the Xpro1, another reason to get a D The way it renders files is different to the XPro1, but in good light, you should have great files.

Having said this, the D will stand you in good stead too. Sean, do you have friends or family in US that can get it for you. Check adorma and KEH camera. Craigslist is even better. D are selling all over. I traded in my new D to enable me to have two D bodies for weddings. After much online homework and reviewing a friends captures with her D was sold on the idea. Feel so much more solid than the newer plasticky models and over the moon with the images! A Classic for sure!

Hey Phillip, what an interesting and brave switch! Good luck with it! Great review and contribution from everyone. I read all comments and bookmarked this page. I owned a D for two years and sold it in to get the newer guy on the block.

Eventually sold D with much disappointment and purchased D Used D for a year and was not happy with its AF. Sold it and purchased d in early with All these cameras were great cameras, amazing features and cleaner pictures. My Daughter in was 3 years. Every time I took pictures of her with these new cameras, I would go back to compare it with the pics I took of her with D Apart from color, the images looked more real, 3D and not plasticy.

I am neither a professional nor amateur. I have a full time job that keeps me from doing that. I sold my D in August and started searching for D I bought one of CL in my town, excellent cosmetic conditions, not abused with shutter clicks.

I paid only In December of , I am one happy D owner. It is a great camera, and after many years with a Nikon D, this was a great improvement in image quality.

It is a little heavy to carry around with the large lenses attached, but that is why you buy a backpack or a bag. I sometimes think, that I should uppgrade, but when I see my photos and compare them with other amateurs like me with photos taken with their DD, I cannot motivate that kind of money.

I love this model, and what I can do with it. Together with my old manual lenses 50 mm f. Everybody can do whatever they want with their money, but I have not yet reached the end of the road with this great camera. Thank you for your review, Mark. Keep up the good work! This wil be my first FF camera. I had a d and sold it. I also own a nikon d3s. I will continue to use these until nikon gets their act together. About a year ago I bought a like new d for Anything in full frame past the nikon d3s has issues with color.

Im talking about shooting on the yellow side and to much green. The thing I like about the d, d3 and d3s are jpeg with no color rendering to do. Great straight out of the camera. Why do you think so many photographers in the wedding industry are using canon. Nikon please deliver us long time users with a larger megapixel camera with the color of the d When you do thats when I will buy or upgrade until then forget it.

I also bought the D4 and sold it. I know a nikon rep who cleans my sensors and he secretly shoot with canon because of the issue. Nikon help us fix your sensor. I am a shooting pro and know what I am doing for over 35 years. I discovered this review because I was curious how many people may still shoot with the d Thanks for the comment Tony.

I apply a batch processing preset upon import of my images to Lightroom to combat any colour shift, but it would be nice if Nikon addressed this in future releases. I agree that the newer Nikon FF cameras tend to render images more on the yellow and green side for jpegs. I own a D and D to back this up D at one point. I replaced my old D with my D as a backup coz its lighter and the colors are somewhat similar to the D I bought a usedone and its on its way.

Glad to hear you agree Tony. Wonderful review Mark, and thank you for praising this amazing camera for what it really is, a superb picture taking tool in every respect, even now this late in ! The feel, the weight, the performance, the amazing rich details that can be achieved with the right lens, the incredible low light performance, and on and on!

The D is not that camera! I currently use a D and Ds. Admittedly the sensor on the D is better but the Ds handles so much more better, the build, feel, the speed. Was thinking of part trading my D to fund the purchase. Sounds like a wise move Peter. Good luck! A lot of pros with affection for the D I got one second hand earlier this year to complement my D and I love it.

Fantastic for event photography and indoor sports with the grip, easy to carry anywhere with a light prime. Given that 4K is 8 megapixel and people are raving about that on 60 inch screens, the D still holds its own and in my opinion is one of the most innovative and useful cameras of all time. You can pick up a used D for a great price now too.